Journal of Financial Economics
An Increase in Submission Fees, A Two-Stage Review Process, and Electronic
G. William Schwert
Managing Editor, Journal of Financial Economics
As I will explain in more detail below, the workload at the JFE has exploded in the last few years. After careful consideration, and consultation with several people who have worked hard on the Journal in recent years, I have decided to make some significant changes in the way the JFE handles submissions.
An Increase in Submission Fees
The last increase in submission fees for the JFE occurred in January 2002. Since that time the U.S. Consumer Price Index has risen more than 6% but, more importantly, the number of submissions to the JFE has grown by about 25%. Through the end of May 2004, the JFE had finished processing 680 papers in the prior 12 months and has another 122 papers under review, for a total of 802 papers. The median turnaround time for this period was 37 days. The comparable numbers in January 2002 were 536 papers processed, with 122 under review, for a total of 658 papers. The median turnaround time in 2001 was 36 days. Thus, we are doing a lot more work.
Based on these data I have concluded that it is necessary to increase the submission fees for the Journal of Financial Economics . At the same time, I am going to increase the payments we make to referees who return their reports within our desired time period, since the valuable service provided by reviewers is our scarcest resource.
After January 1, 2012, the submission fee schedule will be:
For subscribers to the JFE, $600
For non-subscribers to the JFE, $650.
As always, fees on the last submission are refunded for accepted
papers. Resubmissions are generally required to pay another fee
unless the editor explicitly waives this requirement. Submission
fees are also refunded when, in the editor's judgment, the delay
in providing a report and decision letter is abnormally long. Submission
fees involved in disputes between authors and referees will also
be adjusted (see the JFE web page
for more information).
Since its inception, the JFE has prided itself on using economic incentives to help manage the business of the Journal . As you can see from Figs. 1 and 2, in recent years turnaround times have held steady even as the number of papers reviewed and published have risen. The continued rise in submissions is putting a lot of pressure on the resources of the Journal (particularly the referees and the editor). I hope you understand that increasing submission fees is a necessary step to deal with this situation.
Fig. 1. Submissions to the Journal of Financial Economics during the prior 12 months (left-axis) and submission fees for subscribers to the JFE , expressed in terms of August 1973 dollars, using the Consumer Price Index (right-axis).
Fig. 2. Rejection rate for submissions to the Journal of Financial Economics during the prior 12 (left-axis) and median turnaround time in days (right-axis) during the prior 12 months.
A New Two-stage Review Process
While higher submission fees, along with a high rejection rate, should cause prospective authors to carefully consider the decision to submit a paper for review, we still receive too many papers that are either poorly executed or not likely to be of interest to a significant number of JFE readers. Another change I will institute on July 1 is a two-stage review process that should reduce the workload of our scarce refereeing resources.
I will screen all submissions and determine whether, even if the claims of the authors are correct, the topic of the paper is of sufficiently broad interest to warrant publication in the JFE . If I determine that the paper does not meet that standard, I will send a quick rejection letter and refund all but $100 of the submission fee. The submitting author will receive no referee's report and there will be no right of appeal.
This is a substantial change in policy for the JFE . In the past I have only rarely discouraged authors from seeking a review, and these were all cases where the author apparently was unaware of the types of papers typically published in the JFE . I will still follow that practice, but there are many papers that are within the scope of topics outlined for the Journal , but which do not make a significant enough incremental contribution to our knowledge about finance to warrant publication in a high quality general finance journal, such as the Journal of Financial Economics . These are the papers I will screen out before the refereeing process.
My goal is to have fewer referees' reports that merely say "this paper is OK, but just not interesting/broad enough for the JFE ." This outcome is expensive for authors, referees, and editors, and the feedback received by authors typically does not improve their papers very much.
The third part of my plan to improve operating efficiency at the JFE is to make electronic Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF documents the standard mode of submission. Instructions for how to produce a document that disguises the identity of the author from the potential referee are available on the JFE webpage. This is important since the JFE has always used a double-blind review process (the author and the referee are not supposed to know who each other are).
My hope is that the use of electronic submissions will reduce
the frequency of delays caused by referees who travel and have problems
receiving forwarded mail or Fed Ex packages. For the past several
years all of the decision letters and referee's reports from the
JFE have been delivered to authors electronically, and
I have heard few complaints about this process.